Unpaid Commentary |
|||
|
Because the best things in life are free. The UltraFecta My Due Diligence Wonkette Political Animal Daily Kos Eschaton About Thomas Bio Archives 05/01/2002 - 06/01/2002 06/01/2002 - 07/01/2002 11/01/2002 - 12/01/2002 12/01/2002 - 01/01/2003 01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003 02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003 04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 |
2.09.2003
Reagan’s Revenge It turns out that “Unpaid” is being vindicated from all comers, and the most recent of this was Khidir Hamza, the original head of Iraq’s nuclear programme. Hamza appeared Friday on CNN’s Crossfire and stated blithely that Iraq began to develop WMD with the purpose of counterbalancing Israel’s nukes in the late 70’s. He also confirmed that a preemptive Israeli attack on an Iraqi facility in 1986 hardened Saddam’s stance. He supported an American military invasion. He said that Hussein wanted merely one bomb to use as an ultimate deterrent. All of this appeared to be in line with conventional Bush administration thinking. What was shocking though, is what else Hamza said. He proceeded to say that the French were totally willing to help Iraq with the program all throughout the 80s in exchange for economic back-scratching. He also said that the whole point of building a nuclear weapon was to gain more leverage in a future negotiation. In other words, Hussein recognized that he would get a far better shake if he had a bomb of his own. After seeing the response to nations like Pakistan and North Korea, it turns out that Hussein was marvelously prescient. Nevertheless, as an authoritarian dictator Hussein could save himself if only he patterned himself after someone like Pervez Musharraf. If Hussein had soft pedaled the Israelis instead of arming, he wouldn’t have his problem all together. He would get to survive as Hosni Mubarak and Anwar Sadat did for so many years. But for all the remorse Hussein might feel about the wrong course of action, President Bush might want to point the finger at the nonagenarian Ronald Reagan for not brokering an Iraq/Israeli nuclear resolution in the 80s when both countries were US allies. |
||